公仔箱論壇 - Powered by Discuz! Board

標題: 圓圓死於意外!!?? [打印本頁]

作者: lok@@ting 時間: 2011-6-14 04:46 AM 標題: 圓圓死於意外!!??

利害,點都估唔到個編劇真係咁都得~~圓圓死於意外~~
老豆出0黎做證講2句再加law 霸講多2句就判意外~~我睇完仲意外~~

5 h% A1 K& D4 V4 Q
仲有法證都搵唔到ge玻璃,一個係林師奶就搵到~~有0的兒嬉囉~~

作者: momo2010020 時間: 2011-6-14 01:36 PM

黄子华话斋...奇妙啊..

作者: chengren0757 時間: 2011-6-14 03:36 PM

不是吧~~~这么假......

作者: jpsho 時間: 2011-6-14 06:36 PM

Looks like an accident.

作者: kenson 時間: 2011-6-14 06:53 PM

呢出戲唔睇都罷啦話隻cd無證據塊玻璃證據更不足啦
樓主講得無錯咁嘅橋段分明係打倒歐陽震華個出戲

作者: wham2009 時間: 2011-6-14 07:04 PM

意外係意外, but I don't know why the sister don't scream before die.

作者: huangyan81 時間: 2011-6-14 10:11 PM

呢個....只可以站在律師的角度講應該咁樣打....如果系警匪片，唔會有咁嘅結局...

作者: chowpaklungs 時間: 2011-6-14 10:22 PM

如果唔係咁點收科...

作者: Alibaba1973 時間: 2011-6-14 10:25 PM

this call power of lawyer ba~

作者: reevekane 時間: 2011-6-15 06:03 AM

这样算不算误杀？？？意外不需要坐牢

作者: y2jj 時間: 2011-6-15 09:55 AM

震惊啊

作者: LiewJohnLoong 時間: 2011-6-15 05:05 PM

真的是意外？公仔箱論壇' H7 Q% v: X. C: ^, L1 Q" c% }
接受不到咯

作者: 寂寞包围 時間: 2011-6-15 06:17 PM

体古米驳古拉！！哈哈

作者: bleach456 時間: 2011-6-15 07:23 PM

留案待查

作者: dreamyc 時間: 2011-6-15 07:32 PM

不掂啦！平时tvb做到鉴证有几劲！cd的贴纸底不可以验出有没有圆圆的指纹吗？玻璃不是可以验出是由多远的距离射出和射出的范围吗？假到！

作者: tigaking 時間: 2011-6-15 07:54 PM

不知道。。。

作者: cheerful12 時間: 2011-6-16 12:09 PM

yea. i was disappointed at that part too
how can it be an accident?% a. F1 M$ R3 }9 u% O
that piece of glass was accerlated so strongly that it can kill?tvb now,tvbnow,bttvb& Z3 B5 p" W, K9 S( D3 @. S
even Kevin's experiment failed

作者: cheerful12 時間: 2011-6-16 12:10 PM

yea. i was disappointed at that part too
how can it be an accident?公仔箱論壇& Y# S0 W V7 g# r5 T" b
that piece of glass was accerlated so strongly that it can kill?
even Kevin's experiment failed

作者: justinsong 時間: 2011-6-16 04:06 PM

呢度剧本唔通

作者: edwinhiht 時間: 2011-6-18 01:02 AM

聽古唔好駁古..但我都頂唔住, 咁都作得出,跌落街都易合理d啦

作者: buzz21 時間: 2011-6-18 01:04 AM

唉....故仔真係故仔... 咩都由佢講

作者: bbtang47 時間: 2011-6-18 01:43 AM

= =我一直以為仲有下聞...完左啦,呢個故仔

作者: wsalex2002 時間: 2011-6-18 12:10 PM

thank thank thank

作者: akudan 時間: 2011-6-18 12:48 PM

haha ya this storyline is a LOL

作者: winceci 時間: 2011-6-18 07:32 PM

的確幾假ga~~~根本成個案情所有証供控辯雙方都好薄弱下lor~~~btw，lz個師奶叫梁師奶唔係林啊~~哈哈

作者: karlchik 時間: 2011-6-19 02:48 AM

要自圓其說o麻

作者: 打滾男 時間: 2011-6-19 10:16 AM

我O哂嘴啦見到

作者: sophia1201 時間: 2011-6-23 11:17 PM

是一個謎....

作者: kiki39931830 時間: 2011-6-23 11:32 PM

咁我地係睇ge都冇計家!不過到後來發展又幾好睇~

作者: kikisang 時間: 2011-6-24 01:58 AM

不是吧这么假 +1

作者: alex78963 時間: 2011-6-24 09:56 AM

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除內容自動屏蔽

作者: cutecute. 時間: 2011-6-24 08:23 PM

everyone here is very pro..

作者: ava7 時間: 2011-6-24 08:36 PM

yes..i dont agree that

作者: lightpink 時間: 2011-6-24 09:04 PM

係咯，係咯

作者: mrfusion 時間: 2011-6-24 10:11 PM

for the glass fragment to strike her, the glass has to be smash at a precise speed and precise angle with a precise orientation, and possibly if the glass has any pre-existing defect. 公仔箱論壇: j( f; F" `6 |. s8 o
tvboxnow.com# M5 ?4 M! g- W5 A+ V
the possibiolity is endless which will make it impossible to repeat the experiment.

歡迎光臨公仔箱論壇 (http://tvboxnow.com/)