; S0 u# {' A$ `8 Btvboxnow.com然則梁振英政府還談甚麼法律，更談甚麼法治。梁振英私邸非法建築一案，早就不了了之，而他當年的競選對手唐英年，卻因非法建築吃官司，這不知叫甚麼法治；又梁振英最近事發東窗，涉嫌收下澳洲財團UGL五千萬元賄款，立法會卻在中共派議員把持之下，不得調查，這又不知叫甚麼法治。民主之皮不存，法治之毛焉附。公仔箱論壇5 ]& H+ E1 l; e
tvb now,tvbnow,bttvb) T: m; u3 k0 k
中共港澳研究會長陳佐洱評論香港這場民變說：「那是西方的大陰謀。他們要革誰的命？要全國人大常務委員會道歉？要梁振英先生下台？這是絕對做不到的。梁先生的骨頭很硬。」真正硬的，當然不是梁振英的骨頭，而是中共對港人的政策。 , ]" D) s" j5 h1 K# B. G; @ $ ~; m+ P" z7 f% d% y4 e0 h/ btvboxnow.com《左傳》卷九載：衛獻公無道，遭國人驅逐。晉悼公說：「衛人出其君，不亦甚（太過）乎？」瞑臣師曠卻說太甚的其實是獻公：「（獻公）困民之生（使民生貧困），匱神之祀（破壞典章制度），百姓絕望，社稷無主，將安用之？弗去何為？」晉悼公不禁點頭稱善。只是中國君臣二千年前明白的道理，中共今天充耳不聞。' h3 s# G w" {
公仔箱論壇6 k3 h3 a" u+ w. B. O; Q2 ^
tvboxnow.com; }% [: |4 ]. r6 b 作者: felicity2010 時間: 2014-10-23 08:21 AM
本帖最後由 felicity2010 於 2014-10-23 08:23 AM 編輯 : q' _$ z" P& J% ^0 B- x
3 ?& K( q. i Z. ?2 i2 E6 f, s6 HTVBNOW 含有熱門話題，最新最快電視，軟體，遊戲，電影，動漫及日常生活及興趣交流等資訊。NYT: Inequality in Hong Kong ; Z" L; ?3 R5 R5 e: p2 K! j公仔箱論壇9 F+ G2 {. t2 j
; s5 A, k/ ^2 C2 b- U1 s
The talks in Hong Kong between pro-Chinese government officials and pro-democracy student leaders are aimed mainly at easing tensions in the streets. Not on the agenda is fundamental reform of the conditions that provoked the unrest.; w6 A. {4 r! Y9 ~
) `4 a& Q* u6 Y7 G
Chief among these conditions is China’s refusal to loosen its grip on the city’s political system by allowing full and open democratic elections for Hong Kong’s top public office, as it had promised to do. The protesters insist that it is their right to choose who runs Hong Kong, but Beijing-backed officials have supported only cosmetic changes to the city’s restrictive election law. 5 O w: p9 X" _6 ~/ O $ C9 E; H$ j" s8 _2 Utvb now,tvbnow,bttvbA related problem, as Neil Gough of The Times reported recently, is a persistent and widening wealth gap in Hong Kong. A small pro-Chinese government elite has profited greatly from the city’s role in the rise of China, while incomes and opportunities for the middle and working classes have been squeezed. This elite, which controls the most lucrative sectors of Hong Kong’s economy, fears that greater democracy — in the form of political participation and shared prosperity —would threaten the increasingly monopolistic crony capitalism from which they benefit. 5 N& Y8 d4 g5 t/ `" e. F * M5 M# E8 \% H G2 @1 T( XTVBNOW 含有熱門話題，最新最快電視，軟體，遊戲，電影，動漫及日常生活及興趣交流等資訊。The inequality that has helped to fuel the unrest in Hong Kong is reflected in the name the protesters took for their effort — Occupy Central, an allusion to the Occupy Wall Street demonstrations in the United States three years ago that elevated the issue of inequality in America’s political and economic debates.tvboxnow.com; `0 _ E% W0 F: c7 W
$ d$ Z, m- J; y: Btvb now,tvbnow,bttvbOccupy Central, however, has a bigger challenge than its American namesake. It faces a totalitarian regime determined to deny its opponents the political means of changing their circumstances. . F+ W7 g. `- S7 k" U4 Y; X! D O9 N1 D. V ?
The problem in America is a dysfunctional political system that puts party ambitions and campaign donations above public needs. Still, elections and other established political processes, when usedand protected,provide a way to identify and choose new and presumably more responsive leaders. & ^& A. ^. i2 K4 P7 t ! j0 N1 w% p) M) Dtvboxnow.comThe worthy goal, in Hong Kong and the United States, is to link robust democracy to robust capitalism to broadly raise living standards. Like all worthy goals, it is not achievable or sustainable without struggle. / S2 H/ z9 w7 N* ^4 H! Utvb now,tvbnow,bttvb $ q! G5 H4 x1 i/ |+ p5 O& T公仔箱論壇
