原帖由 nitz 於 2008-2-4 11:15 AM 發表
. e1 x5 w9 x/ Xtvb now,tvbnow,bttvb佢地影得就預左無c隱...(俾當事人睇返)
}# ]) i3 D4 S: ntvb now,tvbnow,bttvb不過無義務俾晒廣大市民睇lor...
8 S9 @5 y, m: b/ _" T$ {* t3 V5 l公仔箱論壇偷野果個一定係唔arm ga喇.. . }8 T1 h' y2 m% ^, A) O/ b+ itvb now,tvbnow,bttvb
3 G, V7 y" M1 CI am totally 120% supporting the above.
8 l8 @' @ d. g# U M1 U公仔箱論壇Everyone in HK had their own rights to do whatever they want in their home as long as their action is not affecting the public. (By-law act)
) G- k7 U. J& s4 O' sThis is hard to define from this point But the leakage of the stolen information is definatly WRONG.
* a8 f6 ~, [6 K3 ?tvb now,tvbnow,bttvbI believe the HK police is acting quickly to arrest the person who release the stolen information is base on the common criminal act if someone call the police for the stolen information.tvb now,tvbnow,bttvb& C2 v, P, T% t S: K: ?, e, T
No questions ask. I don't understand why people acting so senitive for such a normal proceduce. Morover, those arrested people will be judge on court...tvb now,tvbnow,bttvb" J/ l- w& _+ v/ v4 k. e9 \; U; a% \
Okay back to the question... 您地覺得 <裸照風波> 最大罪係邊個... Who is the most guility one?
1 i; `# Q/ I/ k- g; Utvboxnow.comFrom the criminial act : the one who post up the stolen information z' {$ H% m+ `! `
From the moral side: the one who create this nude pictures. |